The
Tom Hyland Story
One
Citizen's Quest to Travel Free and Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights and
Now, Alert His Fellow Citizens into Awareness
Dear Patriot,
Tom Hyland is a citizen of Santa Fe, New Mexico who is fed up with the
unconstitutional machinery of government system operative in his state, and in
ALL others, by whom government, fraudulently, and deceptively, coerces, under
threat, Sovereign American Citizens, against their will, into participating
with the state Motor Vehicle Division which regulates "driving",
"driver's licenses", plates and insurance. Rights guaranteed in the
Constitutions may not be controlled, legislated, manipulated, limited,
restricted, denied or taxed, in any way. However, in this country, if the
Citizens do not know, claim, demand and enforce their Rights, then they have
none. Tom knows this and has been the "beligerant
claimant in person".
Every American Citizen has the Right of free and unrestricted travel in this
Nation. According to laws well established he is free to travel in his own
private motor conveyance, upon the public roads. When Citizens are unaware of
their Rights and allow those Rights to be converted into
"privileges", which then are controlled, manipulated and taxed, those
Citizens willingly surrender their Rights and, in so doing, collude and
conspire with government to defraud and deprive themselves of Rights guaranteed
in the Constitutions, both federal and state. We the People have been duped
into participating in this fraud by our own governments. When government deals
with the People, the People should be able to expect, in this "free"
Nation, that government will deal "lawfully" with them, and not
"defraud" them, as a usual custom, practice and policy of government.
The expectations rarely, if ever, meet the reality of actual government
practice, yet the People do little, if anything, to stop it. Do you see why the
governments have no respect for the People?
Tom won two cases in New Mexico
courts brought by the State of New Mexico
against him for "no driver's license, no plates, no registration, and no
insurance". Both cases were dismissed, with prejudice, and have established
precedents, whether recognized, or not. To expose this fraud and restore
Constitutional governance to New Mexico,
Tom filed a Complaint and case in the state's first judicial district court, in
Santa Fe, against 34 individuals
who work for the machinery of government of the State of New
Mexico, including governor, Bill Richardson, who is
currently running for president. Bill is one of many defendants in this case
who defaulted, as did all members of the state supreme court. The first
judicial district court is listed in Dun & Bradstreet as a "private
company", whose principal officer is one Patricio
Serna, who may or may not be the same Patricio Serna
who is a justice of the state supreme court and a defendant in the case. You
may be very surprised to learn that your own "friendly" court in your
own location may also be listed as a private company or corporation, operating
as a business, for profit, rather than as one of the three branches of
government, theoretically "serving" the People under Constitutional
mandates. Check with Dun & Bradstreet and obtain printouts from them
regarding this, then use them.
The following article by Tom Hyland, reprinted here with his permission,
explains what Tom did to voluntarily surrender his "driver's
license", plates and registration to the MVD, for which he received a
print-out from the MVD which upheld his Constitutional Rights and declared him
a "Non-driver".
I ask all of you who read this to send copies by email or printed copy to ALL
of your friends and associates, and ask them to disseminate this as widely and
deeply as possible, to their friends, family and associates, everywhere.
Possibly you know of or have a local newspaper, magazine or Patriot publication
that will print this.
Few will have the greatness to bend history; but each of us can work to change
a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written
the history of this generation ... It is from numberless diverse acts of
courage and belief that human history is thus shaped. Each time a man stands up
for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against
injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a
million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current
which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.
Let's get behind this true American Patriot!
In the battle for Liberty,
THE JAILHOUSE LAWYER
http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston
Awareness is the single most important ingredient of our lives. Without it we
remain in the dark and ignorant; forever unable to know what we don't know.
Tom Hyland
A LONG STRANGE TRIP
I have lived in New Mexico for
over 40 years, and 18 of those years in Santa Fe
County. Most of my friends are
self-created types who work for themselves, as this is also my lifestyle.
Having made a living since the age of 17 as a sign maker and graphic designer,
has enabled me to appreciate the freedoms my lonely schedule affords me, and I
have attracted similar life-styled friends who are fiercely independent and
curious as to the workings of our government and encroachments upon their
rights. It is my impression that individuals who remain employed throughout
their lives are less likely to have the time to study, question, or oppose
authority. The true reality of the original intent of our nation is that We The People ARE the authority. All agents, officers, and
officials of this nation are our servants, but because it is human nature that
a government unchecked will grow into an abusive and dangerous entity, the
servants of this nation must pledge an oath to defend and protect the
Constitution, which is the foundation of all law and the guarantee that your Rights will remain unalienable.
In my studies I learned many years ago that the driving code is commercial in
nature. I obtained my first drivers license at the age of 14 after completing a
drivers training class at Roswell High and have been a licensed driver until July 26, 2004. On that day, I visited
the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Division headquarters in Santa
Fe and returned my license, registrations, license
plates, Certificates of Title, and anything else that had the word MVD printed
upon it. I requested the secretary to print out the latest summary of my
"Client History" which defined me as a "Non-Driver" with one surrender and no violations.
By law, the only individuals who are required to license themselves and their
vehicles are those who are involved in the commercial activity of transporting
goods or paying passengers for a living. We The People have a Right to own the
cars we have purchased and travel upon the public Right of Way. However, it has
been written since the times of horse and buggy that the commercial activity of
transportation shall be a regulated privilege. "The right of the citizen
to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon,
either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may
prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right
to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thomas v. Smith, 154 SE
579.
In my meeting with the directors of the MVD, I opened the books of laws
defining these commercial activities and read aloud certain passages describing
jurisdiction and intent. I asked the directors if they could prove anywhere, in
written law, that the Citizen must relinquish his right to travel and subvert
that freedom into a paid-for privilege. The directors were unable to interject
any proof at all except to say I am welcome to my opinions. I was reading from
a page titled "Definitions" and I pointed out that the title atop
this page wasn't "Opinions." From New Mexico Administrative Code
Title 18, section 18.2.3.12, is the definition
"Driving of Motor Vehicles": "The department of public safety
hereby adopts Part 392 of Title 49 of the Federal Regulations with no
amendments." I offered the page from 49 CFR 392 for them to peruse, which
begins with the headline: "Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles." At
that point, the directors went silent and I told them I would return the
following Monday and close my account.
About two months later, I was detained in a traffic stop by a Santa
Fe police officer whose probable cause for stopping me
was her observation that there was no license plate on my pickup truck. I
showed this officer an Affidavit, executed on the day of July 24th, attesting
to the items returned to the MVD. I showed the officer the printout from the
MVD database of my status as a non-driver. And, I produced the same definitions
from Title 18 and the Code of Federal Regulations I mentioned in the previous
paragraph. This officer was confused and unable to reach a decision without
calling her commanding officer, and this other fellow arrived shortly
thereafter. He read over the same facts, laws, and evidence, and ordered that
my truck should be towed away, and held in ransom, until I became, once again,
a participant within the commercial driving codes defined by Title 18. At the
moment the front wheels of my truck were lifting off the ground, the original
officer said, "So, tell me some more about your rights." I replied,
"These are your rights, too, but you told me earlier that you didn't want
to hear anything about the Constitution or my rights." She replied,
"Yeah.... that's correct."
I immediately phoned Sheriff Greg Solano to inform
him of this attack upon my rights and my property. The Sheriff, in America,
is the only elected police officer, and he has the authority, and duty, to
protect and defend his citizenry against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The
Sheriff has the authority and power to eject any agent from any federal agency
operating without court ordered warrant, be it FBI, CIA, IRS, ATF, ICE, or any
other problematic initials, that are operating within the boundaries of his
county jurisdiction. Every phone call to my sheriff went unanswered. Over the
next two weeks, I wrote the sheriff two letters. In a written letter to me,
Sheriff Solano replied, "... until such time as
a court of law rules that citizens may declare themselves sovereign, I cannot
act to assist you in this matter. As you well know, I am sworn to uphold the
constitution and the laws of the federal, state, and local governments. As part
of that responsibility, I must rely on court rulings on matters such as
yours." We The People created the Sheriff. We created the courts. We
create the judges. And there is no court that has the authority to determine if
we are sovereign, or not. Sheriff Solano wrote that
he must uphold ALL laws. The lawful definition of a law officer is the first paragraph
to NMSA 29 (New Mexico Statutes Annotated), titled "Law Enforcement."
It reads, "29-1-1. It
is hereby declared to be the duty of every sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable
and every other peace officer to investigate all violations of the criminal laws
of the state which are called to the attention of any such officer or of which
he is aware, and it is also declared the duty of every such officer to
diligently file a complaint or information, if the circumstances are such as to
indicate to a reasonably prudent person that such action should be taken, and
it is also declared to be his duty to cooperate with and assist the attorney
general, district attorney or other prosecutor, if any, in all reasonable ways.
Failure to perform his duty in any material way shall subject such officer to
removal from office and payment of all costs of prosecution."
It was 30 days later when my truck was returned to me. The third letter I wrote
to the tow truck operator, apprising him of his criminal activity of accepting
stolen property, under the lawless orders of the Santa Fe Police Department,
and their ikely unwillingness to pay for his defense
in an upcoming civil trial, convinced the man that it would be best to remove
this truck from his possession. Not knowing when my property would be returned,
I had to buy another truck, as I live almost 15 miles from Santa
Fe, and I had no practical means to work, or buy food,
or attend to my affairs. I need to work, to earn money,
however, driving to work is not a commercial activity. If my only activity was
transporting signs, then I would be involved in commercial transportation.
Driving to work, the grocery store, or bringing a bowl of soup to your
grandmother is your right.
But... is it really MY truck? When you go to a car dealership, and if you pay
the entire amount, no financing through a bank or loan company, you are given
the "Title of Origin" or "Manufacturer's Statement of
Origin." This is the true title to the car. The car manufacturer builds
the car and owns this property until it is delivered to the car dealership. The
car and "MSO" is handed over, for the wholesale payment, and now, the
dealership owns the car. If the customer purchases the car with full payment,
he is given possession of the car and the perfect title, the MSO. Unwittingly,
that individual seeks out the nearest MVD office, hands over the perfect title
in exchange for the MVD fabricated "Certificate of Title", it says
"MVD" right on it, and now THE STATE OWNS YOUR CAR in a commercial
privilege defined as "driving. " Your full compliance is met when you
attach a license plate, with registration sticker, to the bumper, and you carry
the drivers license on your person. This is what gives
the cops the authority to have your car towed away, because, in reality, the
state owns your car. If somebody shoves a gun in your face and demands your
wallet, that is called "robbery." If your property or your money has
been stolen away without your knowledge or consent, that
is called "conversion." To have been duped into a situation where you
unwittingly waive your rights and ownership of property and convert those
precious belongings into paid-for privilege, is "fraud." To be held
before a judge, or by armed police, and to be forced to pay fines or suffer
imprisonment, is "coercion", "racketeering", and
"extortion." I have brought charges against 34 individuals, working
within the machinery of government of the State of New
Mexico, and I will say more about that later.
On January 15, 2005, I
appeared at the Santa Fe Municipal Court for a pre-trial hearing to review the
charges brought against me during that traffic stop in September. The
prosecuting attorney for the City of Santa Fe,
Art Michael, was stunned when I described to him that there was no nexus
connecting me to the New Mexico MVD. Mr. Michael asked me if he may shake my
hand. I allowed this and he said, "You are the first person, ever, to come
in here and tell me this." All charges against me, no license, no
registration, no insurance, were dismissed, with prejudice.
On June 23, 2005, I was
detained late one evening when a New Mexico State Police officer observed that
one of my headlights was defective. Only minutes earlier, I became aware of the
headlight, and was turning my brights
on, and off, when other cars neared, and was intent on returning home and
fixing this light immediately. This traffic stop resulted in three citations,
once again, for the identical charges listed above. However, considering me
walking home several miles in the dark, the officer waived the truck being
towed. In the ensuing months leading to a trial by jury, I mailed the state cop
so much information regarding the fraudulent nature of the MVD, and his own
upcoming performance at my trial to testify against me, that this individual
quit the police and became a security guard.
I requested specifically that my rights to a trial by jury be secured, and this
was granted by the presiding judge, Sandra Miera.
However, as the trial approached, I asked the judge to certify a subpoena that
called for Santa Fe Prosecuting Attorney Art Michael to appear and testify on
my behalf. I wanted Mr. Michael to describe to the jury how he dismissed the
identical charges now brought against me once again, in my previous appearance
at the Santa Fe Municipal Court. When Judge Miera was
presented with the subpoena to certify, she recused
herself from the case. And within minutes, the case was reassigned to Judge
George Anaya, but right to trial by jury was
subverted to a "hearing." A hearing is a judicial venue in which your
fate is decided by only one person, a judge. The word "hearing" does
not appear in the Constitution, because of its biased and unfair nature, and
the framers of our Constitution underlined that only true and fair due process
of law could be met within a trial by jury.
On October 12, 2005, the
hearing regarding arraignment for my second incident was conducted at the Santa
Fe County Magistrate Court. The entire affair
ended in less than 30 seconds when Judge Anaya
dismissed all charges, with prejudice. "Dismissed with prejudice"
means that the matter has been put to rest, forever, with no grounds to ever
open or re-examine again. Dismissed "without"
prejudice leaves the case vulnerable for further controversy.
On the afternoon of September 22, 2006,
I was near the plaza in Santa Fe
and had just locked my truck and was walking away when a Santa
Fe police officer drove up and announced, "Hey...
you were not wearing a seat belt." I asked him, "Isn't it a bit late
to be discussing whether I was wearing a seat belt or not?" He didn't
answer that question but asked to see all of my credentials. When I told him
where my credentials went, and how long ago, the officer retreated to his
police cruiser to confer with headquarters on the radio. Whoever he was
speaking with told him to not issue any tickets, only warnings. The
"warning" section of the traffic citation states that you are
admitting that laws have been violated, but there will be no fines issued or
court dates to meet. I refused to admit that I had broken any laws and signed
"All Rights Reserved" just before my signature.
When you receive a traffic ticket, there is a headline atop the page that
reads, "Uniform Traffic Citation." Uniform means this is the same
procedure, the same laws, the same jurisdiction from state to state. It is the
same company doing business over every square inch of this country. This isn't
only a New Mexico fraud, but a
fraud that we suffer in every state in the union. An unpaid parking ticket in Oregon,
from five years ago, will prevent you from renewing a driver's license in Rhode
Island tomorrow afternoon. With a driver's license,
you have no right to be on the road, you have no right to park your car on the
street.
After these three incidents had passed, I considered the state of affairs which
is my life. Having read and absorbed the Constitution and a great many driving
codes, plus, other laws regarding income taxes, building codes, and further
studies too numerous to mention in this article, I came to the conclusion that
I am very much like a human yo-yo. My public servants will continue forever to
yank my up and down like a toy on a string, unless I devise a civil suit that
will expose the treachery and deceit of this fraud that has been robbing the American
people for over 90 years. "The claim and exercise of a constitutional
right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. U.S.
230 F 486, 489.
PART II
Part One of this story described the many facts, laws,
and evidence I have acquired regarding the jurisdiction of "driving",
which is defined in every state as "driving a commercial motor
vehicle." The only individuals required to hold a drivers license are
those involved in the commercial transportation of goods or paying passengers.
This reality has been underlined by over 100 Supreme Court cases, federal and
state, upholding and protecting our Right to Travel. In July 2004, I closed my
account at MVD when I surrendered every item fabricated by that agency and
received proof from their official data base of that transaction. Since then, I
have incurred great expenses, losses, and inconvenience,
however, I knew that I would encounter many obstacles on the road back to Our
Liberty.
In preparing a body of evidence that could be used in a court of law to prove
my case, I began issuing a series of letters addressed to my public servants.
The First Amendment to the Constitution states, in part, ...
"Congress shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances." I wrote several
letters, and finally, affidavits, explaining the jurisdiction of commercial
traffic code, and how I had ended all contracts with the MVD, and the ensuing
events that unfolded. These letters and affidavits were addressed to the Governor,
the entire Supreme Court, the Attorney General, Secretary of State, Speaker of
the House, Senate Pro Tem, Director of MVD, Secretary of Taxation &
Revenue, Mayor of Santa Fe, all city counselors, Chief of Police, arresting
officers, and several other individuals working within their personal and
private capacities within the government agencies of New Mexico.
Each and every letter was specified individually to notify and remind that
public official of their personal connectedness to the machinery of government,
and their duty and oath, which would enable them to receive a complaint, and
then rectify the problem. The letters, and then affidavits, were a primer of
facts, laws, and evidence that would inform that official of the specific
nature of the commercial driving code, and the sovereign Citizen's Right to
Travel as a guaranteed life right, and not a paid-for privilege.
As I described in Part One, the driving code dissolves your Right to own the
very car you paid for, and your Right to free passage upon the streets and
highways of this land. When you receive a traffic ticket, there is a headline
atop the page that reads, "Uniform Traffic Citation." Uniform means
this is the same procedure, the same laws, the same jurisdiction from state to
state. It is the same company doing business over every square inch of this
country. This isn't only a New Mexico
fraud, but a fraud that we suffer in every state in the union. An unpaid
parking ticket in Oregon, from
five years ago, will prevent you from renewinga drivers license in Rhode Island
tomorrow afternoon. With a drivers license, you have
no right to be on the road, you have no right to park your car on the street.
Not one individual replied or answered any of my letters. Nobody replied to the
affidavits, though they were warned that you cannot rebut an unanswered,
unchallenged affidavit by the time it is presented as evidence in a court of
law. It was a peculiar and unsettling feeling to me
that not one of the 34 individuals I wrote felt any compulsion or duty to
respond or inquire regarding the injustice of this wide ranging malady nor did
anyone express any thoughts regarding my well being or concerns.
The civil case titled "Thomas Hyland v. the machinery of government of the
State of New Mexico" was
filed at the New Mexico First Judicial District Court on December 27, 2006. From the paragraph
"Relief Demanded" is this: "Plaintiff Hyland demands that the
rule of valid and Constitutional law be reinstated in this instant case, to
accomplish the following: (a) Defendants be penalized for their fraud,
collusion, and conspiracy to commit fraud, conversion, extortion, racketeering,
and conspiracy to deny and deprive Plaintiff of his Constitutional Rights, and
the Court direct the Defendants to use their authorities to correct, forever,
these crimes upon Plaintiff and all other constituents of Defendants. (b) Stop,
permanently, the unwarranted detainment of motorists, upon the alleged probable
cause that they do not display Motor Vehicle Division license plates,
registration stickers, or seat belt compliance, as these codes only pertain to
the "licensed driver", that individual who is involved in the
commerce of transporting goods or paying passengers upon the streets and
highways of America as an occupation. (c) Restore Constitutional governance to
the State of New Mexico, as
intended by the Constitutions, and to restore a Constitutional
Republic, as required by Article
IV, Section 4, of the Constitution of the United
States of America." (d) Award plaintiff
damages for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and emotional distress arising
from the unlawful deprivation of his Constitutionally guaranteed Rights, which
are priceless........."
On Friday afternoon, May 11, 2007, I was compelled to appear at the unconstitutional
venue of a hearing, (read Part One to better understand the unconstitutional
nature of a hearing) presided by Judge James A. Hall. Purpose of the hearing
was to rule on Motions to Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights, Motions for
Default Judgment against 17 Defendants who failed to answer the case, motion to
proceed towards Trial by Jury against the one individual who did answer, that
being Sheriff Greg Solano, and Right to Trial by
Jury, which is granted in the federal and state Constitutions. Counsel for the
defendants filed motions to dismiss and motions denying proper service for all
defendants. Judge Hall committed sedition, insurrection and treason when he:
(a) denied the Constitutional Rights Motion, which means he denied my right to claim
rights, the Constitutions, all Rights guaranteed therein, his oath, and due
process of law; (b) denied the Right of trial by jury without fee. Both the
federal and state constitutions protect the Right to trial by jury. If you've
read this entire article this far, then you probably know what I'm getting at.
You cannot be made to pay for a right. The New Mexico Constitution, Article II,
Section 12 states: The right of trial by jury as it has heretofore existed
shall be secured to all and remain inviolate." The efforts of Hall
extracting fees from the Citizenry to exercise basic Rights guaranteed in the
Constitutions could be compared to the moneychangers who set up business in the
temple.
Hall stated he wanted the case determined on its merits, which is this story I
am telling, yet, he dismissed Sheriff Solano from the
case without any consideration, fact, or law, whatsoever, for the merits of the
case concerning Solano. Hall ignored the Certificate
as to the State of the Record, attested to by the court clerk, stating that 17
defendants were in default, and in contradiction to court rules, denied my
Motion for Default Judgment. Hall stated that the Supreme Court can modify,
restrict or overturn the Constitution, and can "interpret" the Constitution,
which again, is sedition, insurrection, and treason. Hall disobeyed the Code of
Judicial Conduct, including the requirements to be unbiased, fair, just and
impartial in the conduct of his duties before the court.
There has been a second hearing slated for June 8, to determine if the case
shall move towards trial concerning 33 remaining defendants, though 17 of those
defendants were certified "defaulted" by the court clerk, and thus,
lawfully, there would be no further controversy regarding those individuals,
except that Hall has revived their status as defendants in cause, in an attempt
to erase their record of default, which places a fraud upon the court, and
further exemplifies Hall's behavior as traitor to his oath and the people he
swore to serve and protect. Diligent work has been accomplished by myself and several Citizen witnesses at this hearing and we
have filed charges against James Hall for treason. "Crime is contagious.
If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites
every man to become a law unto himself; it invites
anarchy." Olmstead v. United States,
227 U.S. 438.
The actions of "Affidavits of Observation of Treason, Active in the First
Judicial District Court by James Hall, Acting as Judge, Pursuant to his
Oath", delivered to state and federal officers, should bring this man down
and remove him from any claim to position or retirement benefit. However, the
performance of Mr. Hall, and his dismissal, might be only the beginning of the
results of corruption that has been festering within our Judicial District
Courts. If you visit the public records of Dun & Bradstreet, the corporate
financial data base, you will learn that the First Judicial District Court has
incorporated itself as a "Private Company" since the year 2002. Its
chief executive officer is one Patricio Serna, who
may be the same Patricio Serna who sits as a member
of the New Mexico Supreme Court. It appears that every District Court in New
Mexico has incorporated and is open for business,
privately. This might explain how the case I presented, based solely on facts,
evidence and Constitutional law, has been attacked by "opinions" and
statutes inferior to the Constitutions. Also, a "conflict of
interest" would be an enormous understatement to describe a "court"
where the "CEO" is one of the defendants in my case. There is a
growing interest among the supportive parties to this case to reveal the putrid
rot that is being flaunted on public record as a court that displays total
indifference and arrogance regarding its original duties and purpose, which are
to uphold the Constitutions, the People's Rights guaranteed therein, and to
serve justice. I thought the courts were for the people, but alas, we have had
these stolen away and now they belong to small and private groups. The major
goal of any company is to reap profits for its officers and shareholders. In
view of this diversion from the original intent of our Constitutional justice
system, it is perhaps inevitable that Mr. Hall would develop a clouded view as
to where his allegiance lies.
By Tom Hyland
5 Bishop Lamy Road
Lamy, New Mexico
(505) 466-7525
PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS NEWSLETTER AS WIDELY AND DEEPLY AND BROADLY AS YOU
POSSIBLY CAN. THE MORE CITIZENS WHO BECOME AWARE OF THIS FRAUD, THE MORE LIKELY
A HUGE GRASS ROOTS MOVEMENT WILL ARISE, SPREAD AND STOP THIS SYSTEMATIC SCAM.
ARE
YOU BEING CLASSIFIED AS A TERRORIST ? - (You may
be surprised!)
JUDGES
BEING SECRETLY TRAINED TO RESIST ARGUMENTS BASED ON CONSTITUTION
THE ANTI-GOVERNMENT MOVEMENT GUIDEBOOK
'AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS CORRUPT BEYOND RECOGNITION'
A
REBUKE OF MODERN JUDICIAL PRACTICES
JUROR'S HANDBOOK
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY REVISITED
ON STATE CITIZENSHIP
The government recognizes two distinct classes of
citizens: a state Citizen and a federal citizen. Each has different rights and
responsibilities. State Citizens created the states who
created the federal government who created federal citizens. Most people are
born state Citizens and become federal citizens without their knowledge
sometime after birth. You can reclaim your state Citizenship status through a
legal procedure.
DEFINITIONS
OF "PERSON" & "INDIVIDUAL"
The word 'person' (persona) does not in the language of the law, as in ordinary
language, designate the physical man.
THE OFFICIAL STATE OFFICE KNOWN AS "PERSON"
The state creates many other offices such as police officer, prosecutor, judge
etc. and everyone understands this concept. However, what most people fail to
recognize and understand is the most common state office of all, the office of
"person." Anyone filling one of these state offices is subject to
regulation by their creator, the state legislature. Through the state created office
of "person," the state gains its authority to regulate, control and
judge you, the real human. What they have done is apply the natural law
principle, "what one creates, one controls.
A RADICAL PERSPECTIVE ON JURISDICTION
The subject of this report is "Jurisdiction," and how it is commonly
obtained by the various courts.
PRO SE LITIGATION
". . . the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important
rights under the constitution and laws." (Elmore v. McCammon
(1986) 640 F.Supp. 905,911): This Right is now under
Attack by the Bar Associations and Judges.
|
