Received as an email from Rickity 20100904 9:40 AM    Subject: "Great eye-opener video!"

Thank you Mike for passing this eye-opener along.  This is a candid video from a court where a declared sovereign came to correct a court error.  Several things to pay particular attention to:

1.  The several attempts by the court to entice the sovereign into accepting the identity of the corporate fiction.

2.  The sovereigns unintimidated and non-argumentative insistence on his non-corporate identity outside the court's jurisdiction.

3.  The sovereign handing over the "person" (birth certificate for the corporate fiction) for whom the court has jurisdiction.

3.  The judge's intimidating command for the sovereign to be seated and to have him escorted from the court.

4.  The court officers' lack of willingness to apprehend the sovereign despite the judge's command.

5.  The sovereign's taking authority on record when the judge decides to leave.

6.  The judge BOWING to the sovereign as he leaves!  Yes, you read correctly.

  A couple months ago I watched another candid video taken in a British courtroom where a case was dismissed when a sovereign turned over the birth certificate of the "person" that was legally required to "appear" in the case.

"When a honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest." - Amicus Solo

Can also be found at:

A number of people have emailed Me
stating that the video has been removed from YouTube.

Since the video is removed from YouTube, I am including it here:

Click on image

Give it time to load and then click on play
and then give it time to start.

I recommend reading the blogs at both YouTube locations.

Keith makes these statement on YouTube:

" The key is simply know who you are, stay in honour and stand your ground peacefully. I was in "court" because I parked mine or my wife's conveyance on my Sovereign land (i.e.) lawn. No ticket, straight to a court summons issued on a fictitious entity. On and for the record this file was filled with goodies and they waited until the entire case docket was done before they called a name that sounded familiar as in an account that I am administer for. Unfortunately for the court, there were over 20 people there in support of me and most of them were Sovereigns as well...Included in the room were 3 other Peace Officers from WFS and myself, a sworn to the people Peace Officer and duly witnessed and Notarized as such....Hope this is helpful...Case dismissed with cause and prejudice, note the judge bowing before he abandoned the court. This video was recorded in Common Law jurisdiction and authorized by myself as such. Copyright September 1st, 2010 Keith of the Thompson Clan, All rights reserved."

"The only bench warrant they can issue from Admiralty jurisdiction is on the fiction "WILFRED KEITH THOMPSON" and they already have that "person" in their custody, it was surrendered to the court into their jurisdiction... they have the person they were looking has nothing to do with me, the flesh and blood sovereign freeman on the land.... That person is now a "ward of the state" and they are now fully liable for it and all of it's accounting.... spot the ramifications here if you can...peace, kt "

"It works in ALL commonwealth countries, US included since it too, is a crown corporation...get on it...kt"

"As I warned the court bailiffs....touch me and you'll be charged with assault...1.? I'm a peace officer within my jurisdiction, as were they...and 2. I am the sovereign, the authority in my jurisdiction...attacking the Sovereign is high treason, not a good place to visit for anyone...peace, kt"

Some advice from the blogs:

"They were in court, which simply means they were IN THE RECORD, and that's truly what they fear the most: TO HAVE THEIR UNLAWFUL ACTIONS IN THE RECORD, which is evidence against their illegal actions. Dont EVER go to court without a court reporter (best), or a camera (likely? rejected), or your own witnesses. Also, at that point in time the court had not yet acquired jurisdiction over Keith, thus they can't touch him (in court) unless he truly became a threat. Make the RECORD!"

"You may find out your are in jail unlawfully and should then be able to file a Motion to Dismiss on those grounds. If you are in jail because they tricked you into violating your own rights (for example by not invoking your right to remain silent and not to answer questions and thus put the burden on them to find hard evidence on you), you can then? draw a Motion to Dismiss on those grounds: VIOLATION OF RIGHTS, CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS, and much more crimes they commit every day."

"You must have evidence, ON THE RECORD, of their unlawful actions, otherwise they will indeed arrest you for contempt (so you can't fight back). But if you can prove, with evidence,? that what you did was not contempt but simply stand on your sovereignty, than they cannot lawfully touch you and may actually have to pay you damages."

"Folks watch Raymond st clair from England (Free men in court)....Watch how the Magistrate refers to him by his person. He constantly shouts and orders the sovereign man to create Joinder. The sovereing man remains in Honour by not following the orders of the magistrate and therefore does not enter into contract. There magistrate has no other option but to abandon the? court...Case dismissed under common Law....TEE HEE"

Keep in mind that these so-called courts are run by corporate government administrators who are ACTING as judges. You probably have heard the term
"Acting Judge"

If a large corporation such as Microsoft had a court room, it can only prescribe an opinion or judgement on the case or situation at hand pertaining to the people who work for Microsoft unless someone from the outside volunteers to be tried by such court.

The Latest Info I have

In Canada, under the Courts of Justice Act, anyone taking photographs or making electronic recordings at a court hearing can face up to a $25,000 fine or up to six months in jail. That is probably why the video on YouTube was removed. The video received more than 41,240 hits before it was removed.

The video was probably recorded by a Keith supporter. There appears to be an ongoing investigation concerning the videotaping incident.

When the justice of the peace took a recess, during Thompson’s matter on Sept. 1, Thompson considered the case closed. However, the court later reconvened and adjourned the matter to Sept. 30.

Keith Thompson failed to show in Guelph’s provincial offences court Thursday, Sept 30th, but his trial proceeded in his absence. The court found him guilty of two offences of illegally parking a car on a front lawn and not on a legal off-street parking area. On each offence, Thompson was fined $130. $130 x 2 = $260

In an interview, Keith said that as a “freeman on the land,” such so-called laws don’t apply to him. A freeman on the land is someone who lawfully refuses giving consent to be governed and believes no statute or act of government applies.

Usually, a failure to pay court fines can result in collection efforts, which include wage garnishments, bank garnishments, seizure and sale of property and interception of assets. Awhile back, there was a court proceeding against a STRAWMAN pertaining to traffic matters and other charges. I provided paperwork in a certain peculiar manner and did not attend the court hearing. The STRAWMAN was fined by the court. Because the court knew I was in the right and could not collect the fine, they sold it to a third party debt collector. I sent a letter to the debt collector and have never heard from them or the courts again and there is nothing on record about it and no warrants issued. I believe that some judges have an interest in these debt collectors or are their own created businesses.

Email Me your comments and suggestions

Since The Fourth day of the Ninth month
anno Domini Two thousand ten

Your visit counts as number


Thank you!

GemWorld MOTIF
Opal Pendent Facetron Faceting Kit
Wedding Band